Comments and questions on the Questionnaire # 1
Contribution: Dr. Jose Maria VillarĂas Zugazagoitia
submit a question related to the processing of information from Questionnaire 1.
On the next stage of work for APUC:
1. When you ask ten different answers write to those presented in the questionnaire 1, is referred to a different answer for each question, or may be two or more different answers to some of the ten questions total?
2. With respect to the formula that relates in direct proportion to the number of words of courtesy, do we count or consider ALL the words? That is to say, especially in questions 7 and 8 of questionnaire 1, following "formula" courtesy, "forgive," "forgive," etc., the interviewee usually add a litany of explanations: "we are", "Give Back in ...", "go straight": add these words too?
2a. How do we count the cases where the respondent has two or more options for response? "We added twice, as if they were two different people (and add to the final total count of respondents as a person" double ") or consider only one answer selected at random?
2b. How has the words "please" means one or two words, alluding to its semantic content (a) or form (two)?
2c. Do we have to "ageless" under categories 2 and 4, excluding obviously the 3?
grouping proposals 3 and 4 also suppose that involve applying the formula that relates number of words and courtesy.
And finally, I will add two additional late response I just got to approach more easily to calculations with a base of 100 respondents (which may vary, of course, in depending on the answers I give to the questions in this post.)
In the next mail you include them, so that you consume Please data table.
Sorry for not writing a little earlier, but I'm fed up with the affairs of the classes, theses and conference organizers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment