BACK TO APUC
Profra contribution. Araceli Rios
1.The other answers.
1.1.Muestra Sevilla.
1.1.1. For option 1, another 3 "other responses" which earned more was "When you can, please", 30 respondents, 8 was chosen (8 / 30).
"Please", was the election that followed in number (3 / 30) and there was a lone me can attend, please "(1 / 30). These twelve responses
be located next to the option 1 (Excuse me), because it takes more words (I understand that a simple answer, the less complimentary), and likewise with a purely personal comment, tell me seems too polite to ask "please" in a region where the petition or request a service, it is customary to use this phrase.
Although I placed the word "waiter" in Option 4-like 'caballero', "I think there are many people who use the" title "of servers, at least in the case of option 1: waiter, bartender, in case of men, for women it is more commonly referred to as 'Miss'.
1.1.2. In the case of option 6, for my informants' Excuse me occupied 3 and "Sorry", 1 (4 / 30).
This choice would place in option 1, because it "meets the requirement of calling the attention of the server politely."
1.1.3. Interviewee's response to the variant 8 was "Please show me ..."; the ubiquity in the number 3 and was 1 / 30, but I think in the first four options are much" forgiveness "and last four are very straightforward ... would not hurt a "please."
1.1.4. Four informants felt after choosing option 2 for the variant 9: "if I speak more of 'you', if you're young, 'the familiarity'."
I think in this case is not disrespectful, nor the courtesy to tutear, that the treatment of "you" is used and will continue using, as an attitude and a less formal language when addressing people more young.
However, the only person who answered with option 1 made a comment at the end of the survey: "In the street no one would speak of 'you' ... if you do not know anything "
1.1.5. "May I come in?" Response to option 10. I like this option because it includes a very subtle courtesy in which no information or reports about what will happen ("It's going down ... I'm going out").
1.2. Displays Mexico.
1.2.1. "Can, could come, please?" The question soften the tone of application and includes a "please" does not appear in the response options to option 1. (5 / 20).
1.2.2. "The global sign asking for the bill", "raise your hand," "expect eye contact" ... is not to assert in a project like that APUC de que “una imagen vale más que mil palabras”, pero en un restaurante ayuda mucho la expresión corporal (3/20)
1.2.3. Variante 4: 9/20 eligen responder “¿Están formados?”, la ubico en la opción 1 atendiendo a que el informante asume que respetará el turno y con esa pregunta lo hace saber a los involucrados en la situación.
1.2.4. Las variantes 5 y 7 con un total de 20 respuestas cada una da 13/40 con una opción en la que contestan “Primero saludo...”
1.2.5. La variante 6 libera el comentario de un estudiante universitario: le digo “Jefe” para hacerlo sentir más importante y que me conteste mejor”.
1.2.6. Variant 10 is 2 / 20: "May I come in?"
2. SEX utmost courtesy.
2.1. Sample Sevilla.
2.1.1. Women 76% 2.1.2. Men 24% (Average) * * Displays staff
over 300 responses.
2.2. Displays Mexico.
2.2.1. Women 33% of total survey of gender.
2.2.2. Men 40% of total survey of gender.
3. AGE utmost courtesy.
3.1. Sevilla shows 3.2. Displays Mexico.
3.1.1. 13-24 .................. 10% 3.2.1. 13-24 ......... 50%
3.1.2. 25-44 .................. 60% 3.2.2. 25-44 ......... 50%
3.1.3. 45-64 .................. 30%
4. INSTRUCTION utmost courtesy.
4.1. Sample Sevilla.
4.1.1. a) 5%
4.1.2. b) 50%
4.1.3. c) 20%
4.1.4. d) 25%
4.2. Displays Mexico.
4.2.1. a) 0%
4.2.2. b) 20%
4.2.3. c) 50%
4.2.4. d) 30%
approximate percentages of a total of 50 informants in the two areas surveyed.
TEACHER CAREFULLY. ARACELI VAZQUEZ RIOS.
0 comments:
Post a Comment